Search for: "Rodriguez v. Hamlet" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2016, 4:23 am by Giles Peaker
Mr V argued that Superstrike v Rodriguez [2013] EWCA Civ 669 applied and that the deposit paid for the first property should be deemed to have been received by Mr J in respect of the second property. [read post]